T-0.220 palaute k 2004 / Feedback spring 2004
Questions marked by
*
must be answered before you can send the form.
1. * Department
AUT
ARK
MAR
KEM
KON
GNA
KTA
PUU
RYK
EST
TLT
TFY
TIK
TUO
INF
MAK
Other
2. * Year of study (the number of years you have enrolled as a present sudent)
I
II
III
IV
N
Postgraduate
Guest
3. * I was hearing lectures
100-80%
80-60%
40-60%
20-40%
0-20%
I didn't go to lectures
4. * Workload compared to credits
Not enough work
Workload is fine
Too much work
5. If the number of credits is not correct, what would be the correct amount of credits compared to the workload of this course? You can also explain your opinion informally.
6. * Difficulty of the course
Easy
Appropriate
Too hard
7. * Evaluate the following topics on scale Very Poor 1- Very good 4. If the course requirements don't include examination, assignements etc., choose the option 'Not participated'.
aihe
1
2
3
4
Not participated
lectures
exercises
assignments
material
arrangements
course information
exam
usefullness of the course
overall grade for the course
8. * Evaluate the following topics on scale "I completely disagree 1" - "I completely agree 4".
aihe
1
2
3
4
course material formed a clear thematic entity
there was much substantial overlap with the other parts (major/minor or other modules) of my studies
goals of the course were clear to me
criteria for the course grading were informed well
requirements of the course were corresponding with the teaching and the material
9. Here you can comment lectures, assignements, arrangements, exam etc. What worked out well?
10. What did not work out well, how would you develop these things?
11. Here you can comment the course as a whole.